Supreme Court of the United States, 1926

Qualsett v. Kattenburg

Qualsett v. Kattenburg
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided November 29, 1926
273 U.S. 645; 47 S. Ct. 241 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. F. D. Williams for defendants in error, in support of the motion., Mr. Willis E. Reed for plaintiff in error, in opposition thereto.

Qualsett v. Kattenburg

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want of jurisdiction on the authority of Farrell v. O’Brien, 199 U. S. 89, 100; Toop v. Ulysses Land Co., 237 U. S. 580, 583; Piedmont Power & Light Co. v. Town of Graham, 253 U. S. 193, 195; Seaboard Air Line v. Padgett, 236 U. S. 668, 671.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.