Supreme Court of the United States, 1927

Victor Talking Machine Co. v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.

Victor Talking Machine Co. v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 21, 1927
273 U.S. 670; 47 S. Ct. 474 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Messrs. Charles E. Hughes and William H. Kenyon, with whom Messrs. Frederick Bachmann, William C. Mason, and George W. Schurman were on the brief, for petitioner., Mr. Melville Church, with whom Mr. George W. Case, Jr., was on the brief, for respondents.

Victor Talking Machine Co. v. Brunswick-Balke-Collender Co.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Affirmed on the authority (1) of Morgan v. Daniels, 153 U. S. 120, and (2) of United States v. State Investment Co., 264 U. S. 206, 211; Brewer Oil Co. v. United States, 260 U. S. 77, 86; Bodkin v. Edwards, 255 U. S. 221, 233; National Bank of Athens v. Shackleford, 239 U. S. 81, 82; Wright-Blodgett Co. v. United States, 236 U. S. 297, 402; Washington Securities Co. v. United States, 234 U. S. 76, 78; Texas and Pacific Co. v. Louisiana Railroad Commission, 232 U. S. 338, 339; Chicago Junction Railway Co. v. King, 222 U. S. 222, 224; Page v. Rogers, 211 U. S. 575, 577; Dun v. Lumbermen’s Credit Assn., 209 U. S. 20,

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.