Supreme Court of the United States, 1927

Pressed Steel Car Co. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided February 28, 1927

273 U.S. 780; 71 L. Ed. 889; 47 S. Ct. 456; 1927 U.S. LEXIS 947 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Messrs. George A. King, William B. King, and George R. Shields for petitioner.

Cases that cite this one

21 later published cases cite this decision.

Naylor v. Township of Hellam (Pa. 2001)
Schoeller v. Board of County Commissioners (Wyo. 1977)
Ben Lomond, Inc. v. City of Idaho Falls (Idaho 1968)
Town of Hobart v. Collier (Wis. 1958)
Rabouin v. National Labor Relations Board (2d Cir. 1952)
Naumkeag Steam Cotton Co. v. United States (Court of Claims 1933)
Stoneybrook Golf Course, LLC v. City of Columbia (Tenn. Ct. App. 2010)
State Ex Rel. SCA Chemical Waste Services, Inc. v. Konigsberg (Tenn. 1982)
Groch v. City of Berkeley (Cal. Ct. App. 1981)
Jablinske v. Snohomish County (Wash. Ct. App. 1981)
CEEED v. California Coastal Zone Conservation Commission (Cal. Ct. App. 1974)
Town of Los Altos Hills v. Adobe Creek Properties, Inc. (Cal. Ct. App. 1973)
Higgins v. City of Santa Monica (Cal. 1964)
Town of Atherton v. Templeton (Cal. Ct. App. 1961)
Quesenberry v. Estep (W. Va. 1956)
People v. Amdur (Cal. Ct. App. 1954)
City of Huntington v. State Water Commission (W. Va. 1953)
Washington Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Norry Electric Corp. (2d Cir. 1951)
Mumpower v. Housing Authority (Va. 1940)
Daube v. United States (Court of Claims 1932)
Scott v. Champion Bldg. Co. (Tex. App. 1930)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Claims.

Writ of certiorari granted. Judgment of the Court of Claims in so far as it determined that the petitioner is not entitled to recover any sum in this action of and from the United States, affirmed, and the judgment of the. Court of Claims in favor of the United States upon its counterclaim modified by reducing the amount thereof to the sum of$126,202.15, plus the sum of $1,775.34, the costs allowed by that court, and the cause forthwith remanded to the Court of Claims to proceed accordingly, per stipulation of counsel, on motion of Solicitor General Mitchell, in that behalf.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.