Supreme Court of the United States, 1927

Wheeler v. Pue

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 10, 1927

275 U.S. 483 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Maury for defendant in error in support of the motion. Mr. James H. Baldwin for plaintiff in error in opposition thereto.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Feely v. Lacey (Mont. 1958)
Travis v. Bixler Vapor Dry Cleaning Co. (Cal. Ct. App. 1937)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Motion to dismiss granted under § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937), for lack. of jurisdiction. Treating the writ of error as an application for certiorari, the certiorari is denied under the authority of Taubel, etc., Co. v. Fox, 264 U. S. 426, 429; Liberty Bank v. Bear, 265 U. S. 365, 369. Mr. H. L.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.