Supreme Court of the United States, 1927

Phillips v. Oklahoma

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 24, 1927

275 U.S. 489; 72 L. Ed. 388; 48 S. Ct. 32; 1927 U.S. LEXIS 298 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Charles B. Cochran, with whom Messrs. C. B. Ames and Russell G. Lowe were on the brief, for plaintiff in error. Mr. E. S. Ratliff, with whom Messrs. Edwin B. Dabney and George F.. Short were on the brief, for’ defendants in error.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

King Manufacturing Co. v. City Council of Augusta (Supreme Court of the United States 1928)
Washington University v. Public Service Commission of Missouri (Supreme Court of the United States 1927)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

The writ of error is dismissed on the authority of § 237 of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937), for lack of jurisdiction. Treating the writ of error as an application for certiorari, the certiorari is denied for want of a substantial Federal question on the authority of Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 551, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.