Supreme Court of the United States, 1927

Draxton v. Fitch

Draxton v. Fitch
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 31, 1927
275 U.S. 495; 48 S. Ct. 82 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. James Manahan for plaintiffs in error, submitted. Mr. Victor E. Anderson, with whom Messrs. Clifford L. Hilton, Attorney General' of Minnesota, and James E. Markham were on the brief, for defendants in error. „

Draxton v. Fitch

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Dismissed for want óf a substantial federal question on the authority of Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.