Ex parte Stutzman
Cases that cite this one
2 later published cases cite this decision. The 1 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Cordoza v. Pacific States Steel Corp. (9th Cir. 2003)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
The motions of Mr. Charles A. Stutzman for leave to file a petition for habeas corpus in this case and to proceed in forma pauperis therein áre'both denied for the reason, that the. Court, upon examination of the unprinted petition, and papers accompanying it, finds that there are no grounds'upon which the writ of habeas corpus can be issued. The costs already incurred herein by direction of the Court shall be paid by the clerk from the special fund in his custody, as provided in the order of October 29, 1926.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.