Supreme Court of the United States, 1927

Smith v. Kentucky

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided December 12, 1927

275 U.S. 509; 48 S. Ct. 158; 72 L. Ed. 398; 1927 U.S. LEXIS 341 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. A. 0. Stanley, with whom Mr. Stephens L. Blakely was on the brief, for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Orie S. Ware, with whom Mr. Frank E. Daugherty was-on the brief, for defendants in error.

Cases that cite this one

11 later published cases cite this decision.

People v. Sullivan (Cal. Ct. App. 1943)
Laisne v. California State Board of Optometry (Cal. 1942)
In re McKelvey (Cal. Ct. App. 1937)
Colorado State Board of Medical Examiners v. Reiner (Colo. App. 1989)
Elec. Power Res. v. CITY & CTY. OF DENVER (Colo. 1987)
Pueblo of Santa Ana v. Hodel (District Court, District of Columbia 1987)
Electric Power Research Institute, Inc. v. City & County of Denver (Colo. 1987)
Atlantic City Racing Ass'n v. Attorney General (N.J. 1985)
Genda v. Superior Court, County of Pima (Ariz. 1968)
State v. Superior Court in and for County of Maricopa (Ariz. 1964)
Louisiana Greyhound Club, Inc. v. Clancy (Supreme Court of the United States 1929)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam.

Affirmed on the authority of Adams v. City of Milwaukee, 228 U. S. 572, 581, 583; Laurel Hill Cemetery v. City and County of San Francisco, 216 U. S. 358, 365, 366; Dominion Hotel v. Arizona, 249 U. S. 265, 268, 269; Radice v. New York, 264 U. S. 292, 296, 297.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.