Supreme Court of the United States, 1928

Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Baton Rouge Rice Mill, Inc.

Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Baton Rouge Rice Mill, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 29, 1928
278 U.S. 564; 49 S. Ct. 35; 73 L. Ed. 508; 1928 U.S. LEXIS 344 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Walter J. Suthon, Jr., with whom Messrs. J. Blanc Monroe and Monte M. Lemann were on the brief, for plaintiff in error., Messrs. C. V. Parker and Joéeph A. Lovet for defendants in error.

Fairbanks, Morse & Co. v. Baton Rouge Rice Mill, Inc.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The writ of error is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question on. the authority of Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr; 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147.

Messrs. C. V. Parker and Joéeph A. Lovet for defendants in error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.