Supreme Court of the United States, 1928

Wick v. Superior Court

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided December 10, 1928

278 U.S. 575; 49 S. Ct. 94; 73 L. Ed. 515; 1928 U.S. LEXIS 19 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Joseph D. Sullivan for plaintiffs in error., Messrs. F. G. Dorety, Frank. T. Post, Edwin C. Matthias, Charles S. Albert, and Thomas Balmer for defendants in error.

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

Big Horn Coal Company v. SHERIDAN-WYO. COAL COMPANY (Wyo. 1950)
Buscaglia v. District Court of San Juan (1st Cir. 1944)
City of Birmingham v. Home Ins. Co. (Ala. 1940)
Henry v. McCormack Bros. Motor Car Co. (Ala. 1936)
Dillard v. Pittway Corp. (Ala. 1998)
Department of Banking of Neb. v. Pink (Supreme Court of the United States 1942)
Cheltenham & Abington Sewerage Co. v. Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission (Supreme Court of the United States 1942)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The writ of error is dismissed on the authority of § 237 (a) of the Judicial Code, as ¿mended by the act of February 13, 1925 (43 Stat. 936, 937), because the judgment sought to be reviewed is not final within the meaning of this section, however it may be regarded in state procedure; Grays Harbor Logging Co. v. Coates Fordney Logging Co., 243 U. S. 251; Washington ex rel. McPherson *576Bros. Co. v. Superior Court, 274 U. S. 726; Washington ex rel. Terry v. Superior Court, 276 U. S. 626.

Mr. Joseph D. Sullivan for plaintiffs in error. Messrs. F. G. Dorety, Frank. T. Post, Edwin C. Matthias, Charles S. Albert, and Thomas Balmer for defendants in error.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.