Supreme Court of the United States, 1929

Horton v. Prendergast

Horton v. Prendergast
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 7, 1929 · No. 504
278 U.S. 579; 49 S. Ct. 177 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Allen S. Hobbard for appellants., Messrs. Albert Ottinger, Albert J. Danaher, and Henry Purcell for appellees.

Horton v. Prendergast

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question on the authority of Offield v. New York, New Haven and Hartford R. R., 203 U. S. 372, 375; Mt. Vernon-Woodberry Cotton Duck Co. v. Alabama Interstate Power Co., 240 U. S. 30, 32.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.