Supreme Court of the United States, 1929

Baltuff v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 7, 1929

278 U.S. 579; 49 S. Ct. 180 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Eduarda K. Baltuff, pro se. , No appearance for the United States.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

Austin Powder Co. v. Atlas Powder Co. (United States District Court for the District of Delaware 1983)
George M. Mooney v. Brunswick Corporation (7th Cir. 1981)
Application of Edward Burton Legrice (Court of Customs and Patent Appeals 1962)
Katz v. Horni Signal Mfg. Corporation (2d Cir. 1944)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the unprinted record herein submitted, finds that there is no basis for certiorari, application for which is therefore also denied.

The costs already incurred herein by direction of the Court shall be paid by the Clerk from the special fund in hi§ custody as provided in the order of October 29, 1926.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.