Supreme Court of the United States, 1929

Sampere v. New Orleans

Sampere v. New Orleans
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 5, 1929
279 U.S. 812; 49 S. Ct. 262 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. William Winans Wall for plaintiff in error and appellant., Mr. Bertrand l. Cahn, with whom Messrs. Henry B. Curtis and Francis P. Burns were on the brief, for defendant in error and appellee.

Sampere v. New Orleans

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

Affirmed on the authority of (1) Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co., 272 U. S. 365; Zahn v. Board of Public Works, 274 U. S. 325; Gorieb v. Fox, 274 U. S. 603; (2) Sperry Hutchison Co. v. Rhodes, 220 U. S. 502, 505; Williams v. Walsh, 222 U. S. 415, 420.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.