Supreme Court of the United States, 1929

Lun v. Bond

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 11, 1929

279 U.S. 818; 49 S. Ct. 263 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Messrs. James M. Flowers, Earl Brewer, and Edward C. Brewer submitted for plaintiffs in error., Mr. James A. Lauderdale, with whom Messrs. Rush H. Knox, Attorney General of Mississippi, and Mr. E. C. Sharp were on the brief, for defendants in error.

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

Westgate-Sun Harbor Co. v. Watson, Commissioner of Patents (D.C. Cir. 1953)
Howard v. Wilbur (6th Cir. 1948)
Howard v. Wilbur (6th Cir. 1948)
Meth v. United Benefit Life Ins. Co (3d Cir. 1952)
Christianson v. West Pub. Co. (9th Cir. 1945)
Erwyn Products, Inc. v. Lander Co. (District Court, S.D. New York 1941)
Central Surety & Ins. Corporation v. Murphy (10th Cir. 1939)
Lederer v. Metropolitan Life Insurance (Pa. Super. Ct. 1938)
Van Camp Sea Food Co. v. Packman Bros. (3d Cir. 1935)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The judgment is reversed, with directions to the Circuit Court of Coahoma County, Miss., to dismiss the petition for mandamus without costs, because the controversy involved has become moot. Atherton Mills v. Johnston, 259 U. S. 13; Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U. S. 216; Alejandrino v. Quezon, 271 U. S. 528, 535; Norwegian Co. v. Tariff Commission, 274 U. S. 106, 112.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.