Supreme Court of the United States, 1929

Ex parte Northern Pacific R.

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 14, 1929

280 U.S. 513 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Messrs. Bruce Scott, H. H. Field, F. G. Dorety, M. S. Gunn, and Dennis F. Lyons for petitioners.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to file a petition for a writ of mandamus, and the motion for leave to amend and supplement such petition, are granted.

A rule is directed to issue against the respondents, returnable on the first motion day following a period of 30 *514days from this date, directing them to show cause why a writ of mandamus should not issue in this cause.

Messrs. Bruce Scott, H. H. Field, F. G. Dorety, M. S. Gunn, and Dennis F. Lyons for petitioners.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.