Supreme Court of the United States, 1929

Hallam v. Grant

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided November 25, 1929

280 U.S. 522; 50 S. Ct. 82 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. William H. Hallam, pro se, for petitioner., No appearance for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

In re the Marriage of Kotler (Or. Ct. App. 2016)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed further' herein in forma pauperis is denied, for the reason that the Court, upon examination of the unprinted record herein submitted, finds that there is no substantial federal question upon which a writ of certiorari can be issued. The petition for a writ of certiorari is therefore also denied. *523The costs already incurred herein shall be paid by the Clerk as provided in the order of October 29, 1926.

Mr. William H. Hallam, pro se, for petitioner. No appearance for respondent.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.