Supreme Court of the United States, 1929

Troche v. California

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided December 9, 1929

280 U.S. 524; 50 S. Ct. 87 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Ray T. Coughlin, with whom Mr. Roland Becsey was on the brief, for appellant., Messrs. U. S. Webb, Attorney General of California, and William F. Cleary, Deputy Attorney General, were on the brief for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

10 later published cases cite this decision.

Robert Muench v. Thomas Israel and Attorney General of Wisconsin, Richard Worthing v. Thomas R. Israel (7th Cir. 1983)
State v. Brom (Minn. 1990)
Morgan v. Krenke (District Court, E.D. Wisconsin 1999)
Carrie C. Wong v. Christine Money, Warden Attorney General of the State of Ohio (6th Cir. 1998)
State v. Wong (Ohio Ct. App. 1994)
Brian L. Haas v. Gordon Abrahamson, Superintendent of the Dodge Correctional Institute (7th Cir. 1990)
Calvin Carlos Campbell v. Louie L. Wainwright, Secretary, Department of Corrections (11th Cir. 1984)
People v. Mathis (Cal. 1965)
Leick v. People (Colo. 1955)
People v. Bales (Cal. Ct. App. 1974)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal- question, on the authority of Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for certiorari, as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial Code, as amended by the act of February 13, 1925 (c. 229, 43 Stat. 936, 938), the certiorari is denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.