Supreme Court of the United States, 1930

Jackson v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 14, 1930 · Butler

281 U.S. 344; 50 S. Ct. 294; 74 L. Ed. 891; 1930 U.S. LEXIS 386 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Thomas Amory Lee, with whom Mr. Turner W. Bell was on the brief, for petitioner., Mr. Claude R. Branch, Special Assistant to the Attorney General, with whom Attorney General Mitchell and Messrs. J. Frank Staley, W. Clifton Stone, and Erwin N. Griswold, were on the brief, for the United States., Messrs. Milo J. Warner and Robert Newbegin filed a brief as amici curiae, by special leave of Court.

Cases that cite this one

10 later published cases cite this decision.

Dresser v. United States (United States District Court, Oklahoma Northern 1949)
Taylor v. United States (United States District Court for the Western District of Arkansas 1953)
United States v. Cathcard (United States District Court, Nebraska 1946)
Anderson v. United States (3d Cir. 1942)
Edmunds v. United States (District Court, D. Oregon 1938)
United States v. Preece (10th Cir. 1936)
United States v. Salmon (5th Cir. 1930)
Federal Crop Insurance v. Decell (Miss. 1955)
Strother v. Commissioner (4th Cir. 1932)
United States v. Campbell (Supreme Court of the United States 1931)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Mr. Justice Butler

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This action was brought in the United States court for Kansas to recover for permanent total disability on a war risk insurance policy. The court gave plaintiff judgment for the amount of the accrued installments with interest on .each to date of the judgment, and directed that the judgment bear interest until paid. 24 F. (2d) 981. The United States took the case to the Circuit Court of Appeals and there contended that plaintiff w;as not entitled to interest. The Circuit Court of Appeals rightly reversed the judgment. 34 F. (2d) 241.

The case is ruled by this court’s decision on the third question certified in United States v. Worley, announced this day, ante, p. 339.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.