Supreme Court of the United States, 1930

Yamhill Electric Co. v. McMinnville

Yamhill Electric Co. v. McMinnville
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 20, 1930
280 U.S. 531; 50 S. Ct. 159; 74 L. Ed. 596; 1930 U.S. LEXIS 776 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Walter L. Tooze, Jr., for appellant., Mr. John P. Kavanaugh for appellees.

Yamhill Electric Co. v. McMinnville

Cases that cite this one

8 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Shulthis v. McDougal, 225 U. S. 561, 569; Hull v. Burr, 234 U. S. 712, 720; Norton v. Whiteside, 239 U. S. 144, 147. Treating the papers'whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for. certiorari, as required by § 237 (c) of the Judicial- Code, as amended by the Act of February *53213, 1925 (c. 229, 43 Stat. 936, 938), certiorari is denied.

Mr. Walter L. Tooze, Jr., for appellant. Mr. John P. Kavanaugh for appellees.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.