Supreme Court of the United States, 1930

Exchange Drug Co. v. Long

Exchange Drug Co. v. Long
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 12, 1930
281 U.S. 693; 50 S. Ct. 244 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Robert Benson Evins for appellant. Messrs. Charlie C. McCall, Attorney General of Alabama, Richard T. Rives, Special Assistant Attorney General, and Lawrence H. Lee on the- brief for appellees.

Exchange Drug Co. v. Long

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Wabash R. R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; Zucht v. *694King, 260 U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.

Mr. Robert Benson Evins for appellant. Messrs. Charlie C. McCall, Attorney General of Alabama, Richard T. Rives, Special Assistant Attorney General, and Lawrence H. Lee on the- brief for appellees.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.