Supreme Court of the United States, 1930

Dunn v. Ohio

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 27, 1930

282 U.S. 801; 51 S. Ct. 84 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Messrs. Rufus S. Day and W. E. Minshall for appellant. Messrs. Gilbert Beitman, Frank R. Hubachek, Henry 8. Brainard, and Alfred Clum for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

Kelleher v. Minshull (Wash. 1941)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam: Messrs. Rufus S. Day and W. E. Minshall for appellant. Messrs. Gilbert Beitman, Frank R. Hubachek, Henry 8. Brainard, and Alfred Clum for respondent.

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Griffith v. Connecticut, 218 U. S. 563; Mutual Loan Co. v. Martell, 222 U. S. 225, 233; Morgan v. Georgia, 281 U. S. 691. The petition for a writ of certiorari in this cause is denied.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.