Supreme Court of the United States, 1931

United States v. Malcolm

United States v. Malcolm
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 19, 1931 · Per Curiam
282 U.S. 792; 51 S. Ct. 184; 75 L. Ed. 714; 1931 U.S. LEXIS 41; 9 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 956; 2 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 650 (United States Reports)
United States v. Malcolm

Cases that cite this one

130 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

282 U.S. 792 (1931)

UNITED STATES
v.
MALCOLM.

No. 512.

Supreme Court of United States.

Submitted January 12, 1931.
Decided January 19, 1931.
CERTIFICATE FROM THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT.

*794 Solicitor General Thacher, Assistant Attorney General Youngquist, Mr. Sewall Key and Miss Helen R. Carloss, Special Assistants to the Attorney General, and Mr. Erwin N. Griswold submitted for the United States.

Messrs. Kingman Brewster, James S.Y. Ivins, Allen G. Wright, A.J. Hill, O.R. Folsom-Jones, Joseph D. Brady, and F.E. Youngman submitted for Malcolm.

PER CURIAM.

The first question certified is answered: No. The second question is answered: Yes. Poe v. Seaborn, ante, p. 101; Goodell v. Koch, ante, p. 118; Hopkins v. Bacon, ante, p. 122.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.