Supreme Court of the United States, 1931

United States Ex Rel. Cateches v. Day

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 23, 1931 · Holmes

283 U.S. 51; 51 S. Ct. 359; 75 L. Ed. 835; 1931 U.S. LEXIS 125 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Harold Van Riper for petitioner., Mr. Claude R. Branch, Special Assistant to the Attorney-General, with whom Solicitor General Thacher, Assistant Attorney General Dodds, and Messrs. Harry S. Ridgely, and Paul D. Miller were on the brief, for respondent.

Cases that cite this one

57 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

Lynch v. Magnavox Co. (9th Cir. 1938)
Kaufman v. Reinecke (7th Cir. 1934)
Ex parte Andal (District Court, S.D. New York 1953)
United States ex rel. United States Lines v. Watkins (2d Cir. 1948)
United States ex rel. Tsevdos v. Reimer (2d Cir. 1940)
United States ex rel. Vounas v. Hughes (District Court, D. New Jersey 1940)
Standard Oil Co. v. Fox (District Court, S.D. West Virginia 1934)
McDonough v. Tillinghast (1st Cir. 1932)
Julia E. Duke v. Gene Durfee and Laura Durfee, Gene Durfee and Laura Durfee v. Julia E. Duke (8th Cir. 1962)
In re Schwartz Bros. (D. Minn. 1945)
St. Louis Union Trust Co. v. Becker (8th Cir. 1935)
Farmers' Loan & Trust Co. v. Bowers (2d Cir. 1934)
Harwood v. Eaton (2d Cir. 1933)
First Nat. Bank of Canton v. Irving Trust Co. (2d Cir. 1933)
May Department Stores Co. v. Bell (8th Cir. 1932)
Burnet v. White Eagle Oil & Refining Co. (8th Cir. 1932)
General Foods Corp. v. Seeman Bros. (District Court, S.D. New York 1932)
Leighton v. United States (9th Cir. 1932)
Buck v. Jewell-Lasalle Realty Co. (8th Cir. 1931)
State Ex Rel. Public Service Comm'n v. Aclr Co. (S.C. 1952)
Hess v. Mullaney (United States District Court for the District of Alaska 1950)
Commers v. United States (District Court, D. Montana 1946)
United States v. Aluminum Co. of America (District Court, S.D. New York 1941)
In re Lambourne's Estate (Utah 1939)
Tobias v. State Tax Commission (Utah 1939)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Mr. Justice Holmes

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This case also arose in the Second Circuit, upon facts similar to those in No. 92, ante, p. 48. The petitioner arrived in this country in October, 1925, upon an Italian ship, deserted at once and since has been engaged in land employment. He was arrested May 8, 1929, and after hearing was ordered to be deported on the same ground as the petitioner in No. 92. A writ of habeas corpus was applied for alleging that the arrest was not made within three years from the date of entry. The writ was dismissed by the District Court and the order was affirmed by the Circuit Court of Appeals. A writ of certiorari was granted by this Court.

Judgment affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.