Supreme Court of the United States, 1931

Cyrus H. McCormick v. David Burnet

Cyrus H. McCormick v. David Burnet
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 23, 1931 · Per Curiam
283 U.S. 784 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. George T. Rogers, with whom Messrs. Horace Kent Tenney, Henry F. Tenney, Roger Sherman, and Robert N. Miller were on the brief, for petitioners., Assistant Attorney Géneral Youngquist, with whom Solicitor General Thacher, and Messrs. Sewall Key and J. Louis Monarch, Special Assistants to the Attorney General, Erwin N. Griswold and Clarence M. Charest, General Counsel, and Prew Savoy, Special Attorney, Bureau of Internal Revenue, were on the brief, for respondent.

Cyrus H. McCormick v. David Burnet

Cases that cite this one

103 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

*784 Per Curiam:

The question in this case is that of the construction of § 402 (c) of the Revenue Act of 1921, c.,‘136, 42 Stat. 227, 278, a provision similar to that of § 402 (c) of the Revenue Act of 1918, c. 18, 40 Stat. 1057, 1097, which has already been construed by this Court, and, in this view, there being no question of the constitutional authority of the Congress to impose prospectively a tax with respect to transfers or trusts of the sort here involved, the judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh. Circuit is reversed upon the authority of May v. Heiner, 281 U. S. 238.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.