Supreme Court of the United States, 1931

Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co.

Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co.
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 26, 1931
282 U.S. 812; 51 S. Ct. 214 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Arthur I. Moulton for appellant. Messrs.• I. H. Van Winkle, Charles A. Hart, and Charles E. McCulloch for appellee.

Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question, Wabash R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.