Supreme Court of the United States, 1931

Varrelman v. Flora Logging Co.

Varrelman v. Flora Logging Co.
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 26, 1931
282 U.S. 813; 51 S. Ct. 214 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr.- Arthur I. Moulton for appellant. Mr. I. H. Van Winkle for appellee.

Varrelman v. Flora Logging Co.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Wabash R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.