Supreme Court of the United States, 1931

Burnet v. Northern Trust Co.

Burnet v. Northern Trust Co.
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 2, 1931
283 U.S. 782; 51 S. Ct. 342 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Walter E. Hope, Assistant Secretary of the Treasury, with whom Solicitor General Thacher and Messrs. Clarence M. Charest, General Counsel, and Prew Savoy, Special Attorney, Bureau of Internal Revenue, were on the brief, for petitioner., Mr. Edward H. Blanc argued the cause, and Messrs. Theodore Schmidt, John W. Davis, Russell L. Bradford, and Frederic Ullmann filed a brief, for respondent., Messrs. John E. Hughes and Raymond M. White, by special leave of Court, filed briefs as amid curiae., Mr. Seth T. Cole, by special leave of Court, filed a brief on behalf of the Tax Commission of the State of New York et al. as amid curiae.

Burnet v. Northern Trust Co.

Cases that cite this one

69 later published cases cite this decision. The 25 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The question in this case is that of the construction of § 402 (c) of the Revenue Act of 1921, c. 13(5, 42 Stat. 227, 278, a provision similar to that of § 402 (c) of the Revenue Act of 1918, c. 18, 40 Stat. 1057, 1097, which has already been construed by this Court, and, in this view, there being no question of the constitutional authority of the Congress to impose prospectively a tax with respect to transfers or trusts of the sort here involved, the judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit is affirmed upon the authority of May v. Heiner, 281 U. S. 238.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.