Supreme Court of the United States, 1931

Meyers v. Whittle

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 20, 1931

283 U.S. 795; 51 S. Ct. 489; 75 L. Ed. 1419; 1931 U.S. LEXIS 201 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Benjamin E. Pierce for appellant., Messrs. George M. Napier and T. R. Gress for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

In the Matter of the Magnavox Company and Sanders Associates, Inc. Appeal of Universal Research Laboratories, Inc., Debtor (7th Cir. 1980)
Lackner v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co. (7th Cir. 1940)
Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Slattery (7th Cir. 1939)
Illinois Bell Telephone Co. v. Slattery (7th Cir. 1938)
Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Wallace (Or. 1937)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The motion for leave to proceed further herein in forma pauperis is denied. The appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Malloy v. South Carolina, 237 U. S. 180, 183, 185; Wabash R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U.S. 427; Zucht v. King, 260 *796U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.

Mr. Benjamin E. Pierce for appellant. Messrs. George M. Napier and T. R. Gress for appellee.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.