Supreme Court of the United States, 1931

Spurrier v. Mitchell Irrigation District

Spurrier v. Mitchell Irrigation District
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 20, 1931
283 U.S. 796; 51 S. Ct. 484 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. J. M. Fitzgerald, with whom Mr. L. L. Raymond was on the brief, for appellants. Messrs. Thomas M. Morrow and William Morrow were on the brief for Mitchell Irrigation District, appellee., Messrs. J. G. Mothersead, Roscoe T. York, Floyd E. Wright, and Wm. H. Wright were on the brief for Gering & Ft. Laramie Irrigation District, appellee.

Spurrier v. Mitchell Irrigation District

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, § 237 (a) Judicial Code, as amended by the Act of February 13, 1925, 43 Stat. 936, 937. Treating the papers whereon the appeal was allowed as a petition for writ of certiorari, as required by § 237 (c) Judicial Code as amended, 43 Stat. 936, 938, certiorari is denied for want of a substantial federal question. Wabash R. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; Zucht v. King, 260 U. S. 174; Sugarman v. United States, 249 U. S. 182; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.