Supreme Court of the United States, 1931

Enameled Metals Co. v. Burnet

Enameled Metals Co. v. Burnet
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided April 27, 1931 · No. 489
283 U.S. 799; 51 S. Ct. 491 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Messrs. S. Leo Ruslander and Clarence N. Goodwin, with whom Messrs. George R. Beneman and Samuel Kaufman were on the brief, for petitioner., Assistant Attorney General Rugg argued the cause and Solicitor General Thacker, Assistant Attorney General Youngquist, and Messrs. Sewall Key and Andrew D. Sharpe, Special Assistants to the Attorney General, Paul D. Miller, Clarence M. Charest, General Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and James K. Polk, Special Attorney, filed a brief for respondent.

Enameled Metals Co. v. Burnet

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

Judgment affirmed. Williamsport Wire Rope Co. v. United States, 277 U. S. 551.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.