Supreme Court of the United States, 1931

Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.

Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 25, 1931
283 U.S. 808; 75 L. Ed. 1427; 51 S. Ct. 646; 1931 U.S. LEXIS 217 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Messrs. Oscar E. Carlstrom, Samuel A. Ettelson, George I. Haight, Benjamin F. Goldstein, Edmund D. Adcock, and Francis X. Busch for appellants., Messrs. Horace Kent Tenney, Charles M. Bracelen, William H. Thompson, Kenneth F. Burgess, R. A. Van Orsdel, and Leslie N. Jones for appellee.

Smith v. Illinois Bell Telephone Co.

Cases that cite this one

16 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed. The order of the District Court merely reinstated the interlocutory injunction pursuant to the opinion of this Court. The *809parties should proceed with the trial of the cause upon the merits as this Court has directed.

Messrs. Oscar E. Carlstrom, Samuel A. Ettelson, George I. Haight, Benjamin F. Goldstein, Edmund D. Adcock, and Francis X. Busch for appellants. Messrs. Horace Kent Tenney, Charles M. Bracelen, William H. Thompson, Kenneth F. Burgess, R. A. Van Orsdel, and Leslie N. Jones for appellee. [See 282 U. S. 133.]

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.