Supreme Court of the United States, 1931

Akron, Canton & Youngstown Ry. Co. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 26, 1931

284 U.S. 575; 76 L. Ed. 499; 52 S. Ct. 26; 1931 U.S. LEXIS 484 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Leo P. Day, with whom Mr. Anthony P. Donadío was on the brief, for appellants., Mr. J. Stanley Payne,' with whom Solicitor General Thacker, Assistant to the Attorney General O’Brian, and Messrs. Daniel W. Knowlton and E. M. Reidy were on the brief, for the United States et al.

Cases that cite this one

3 later published cases cite this decision.

Adams v. Greenwich Water Co. (Conn. 1951)
Missouri Pacific R. v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1934)
Ex Parte Savannah River Electric Co. (S.C. 1933)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The Court is of the opinion that the Interstate Commerce Commission acted within its authority and that its order is supported by substantial evidence. The decree is affirmed. Western Chemical Co. v. United States, 271 U. S. 268, 271; Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. United States, 274 U. S. 29, 33, 34; Alabama v. United States, 283 U. S. 776, 779.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.