Supreme Court of the United States, 1932

Arneson v. United Irrigation Co.

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 18, 1932

284 U.S. 592; 52 S. Ct. 202; 76 L. Ed. 510; 1932 U.S. LEXIS 900 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. S. J. Brooks, with whom Mr. W. L. Matthews was on the brief, for appellants., Messrs. J. Q. Henry, pro hac vice, by leave of Court, and John A. Mobley, with whom Mr. W. L. Cook was on the brief, for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

Bennett v. Brown County Water Improvement District No. One (Tex. 1954)
Bundrick v. Lafayette Parish Police Jury (La. Ct. App. 1985)
Budd Const. Co., Inc. v. City of Alexandria (La. Ct. App. 1981)
Lovret v. Seyfarth (Cal. Ct. App. 1972)
Willacy County Water Control & Improvement District No. 1 v. Abendroth (Tex. 1944)
Operative Plasterers' & Cement Finishers' International Ass'n v. Case (D.C. Cir. 1937)
Wagner v. Leenhouts (Supreme Court of the United States 1932)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the decree of the state court sought here to be reviewed was based on non-federal grounds adequate to support it (Parson Son *593& Co. v. Bird, 248 U. S. 268; Browne v. Union Pacific R. Co., 267 U. S. 255; Live Oak Water Users’ Assn. v. Railroad Commission, 269 U. S. 354, 359; Security National Bank v. Twinde, 278 U. S. 659; Garysburg Mfg. Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 280 U. S. 520); and for the want of a substantial federal question (Wabash Ry. Co. v. Flannigan, 192 U. S. 29; Erie R. Co. v. Solomon, 237 U. S. 427; C. A. King & Co. v. Horton, 276 U. S. 600; Bank of Indianola v. Miller, 276 U. S. 605; Roe v. Kansas, 278 U. S. 191).

Mr. S. J. Brooks, with whom Mr. W. L. Matthews was on the brief, for appellants. Messrs. J. Q. Henry, pro hac vice, by leave of Court, and John A. Mobley, with whom Mr. W. L. Cook was on the brief, for appellees.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.