Supreme Court of the United States, 1933

Petroleum Exploration v. Burnet

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 13, 1933 · Stone

288 U.S. 467; 53 S. Ct. 439; 77 L. Ed. 898; 1933 U.S. LEXIS 48; 12 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 22; 3 U.S. Tax Cas. (CCH) 1068 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Robert Ash for petitioner., Assistant Attorney General Youngquist, with whom Solicitor General Thacher, and Messrs. Whitney North Seymour, Sewall Key, and Andrew D. Sharpe were on the brief, for respondent., By leave of Court, briefs of amid curiae were filed as follows: by Messrs. Thomas R. Dempsey and A. Colder Mackay; by Mr. R. B. Goodell, on behalf of Petroleum Reclamation Corp.; and by Messrs. George W. Wicker-sham and Clarence Castimore, on behalf of Amerada Corporation.

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

Commissioner v. Hickman (5th Cir. 1934)
Twin Bell Oil Syndicate v. Helvering (9th Cir. 1934)
Ramsey v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (10th Cir. 1933)
Amherst Coal Company v. United States (District Court, S.D. West Virginia 1969)
American S. S. Co. v. Wickwire Spencer Steel Co. (District Court, S.D. New York 1934)
Simms Petroleum Co. v. Commissioner (United States Board of Tax Appeals 1933)
Lyell v. Commissioner (United States Board of Tax Appeals 1933)
Page Oil Co. v. Commissioner (United States Board of Tax Appeals 1940)
Monrovia Oil Co. v. Commissioner (United States Board of Tax Appeals 1933)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

Mr. Justice Stone

delivered the opinion of the Court.

Petitioner, a Maine corporation, in making its tax returns of income derived from the operation of oil wells in the years 1925, 1926, and 1927, claimed a deduction from gross income of a depreciation allowance on account of the capitalized costs of drilling the oil wells. The Commissioner refused to allow the deductions and assessed a corresponding deficiency against the taxpayer. On appeal the Board of Tax Appeals held that the deductions should have been allowed. 23 B. T. A. 890. On petition for review the Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit reversed the order of the Board. 61 F. (2d) 273. The court held that the deductions claimed were included in the depletion allowance fixed by § 234 (a) (8) of the Revenue Act of 1926 at 27%% of petitioner’s gross income for the years in question, and could not be allowed as deprecia^ tion of improvements. This Court granted certiorari to resolve a conflict of the decision below with that of the *469 Court of Claims in Dakota-Montana Oil Co. v. United States, 59 F. (2d) 853. For reasons stated in United States v. Dakota-Montana Oil Co., decided this day, ante, p. 459, the Commissioner rightly refused to allow the deductions claimed and the judgment below is

Affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.