Supreme Court of the United States, 1933

Dr. Bloom Dentist Inc. v. Cruise

Dr. Bloom Dentist Inc. v. Cruise
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 23, 1933
288 U.S. 588; 53 S. Ct. 320 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Thomas G. Frost for appellant. Messrs. Arthur J. W. Hilly and J. Joseph Lilly for appellee.

Dr. Bloom Dentist Inc. v. Cruise

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Appeal from the Supreme Court of New York.

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Dent v. West Virginia, 129 U. S. 114; Douglas v. Noble, 261 U. S. 165; Missouri ex rel. Hurwitz v. North, 271 U. S. 40, 43; Graves v. Minnesota, 272 U. S. 425, 428; Lambert v. Yellowley, 272 U. S. 581, 596; People v. Painless Parker Dentist, 85 Colo. 304, 280 U. S. 566; Miller v. State Board of Dental Examiners, 90 Colo. 193; 8 P. (2d) 699; 287 U. S. 563.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.