Supreme Court of the United States, 1933

Healy v. Ratta

Healy v. Ratta
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided March 20, 1933
289 U.S. 701; 53 S. Ct. 522 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. H. Thornton Lorimer, Assistant Attorney General of New Hampshire, with whom Mr. Francis W. Johnston, Attorney General, was on the brief, for appellant., Messrs. William N. Rogers and Jonathan Piper filed a brief for appellee.

Healy v. Ratta

Cases that cite this one

14 later published cases cite this decision. The 13 that cite it most often are listed here.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the want of jurisdiction, as it appears from the supplemental record and was admitted at the bar that the application for interlocutory injunction was not pressed but was waived, and there is therefore no ground for an appeal to this Court. Smith v. Wilson, 273 U.S. 388, 391; Stratton v. St. Louis Southwestern Ry. Co., 282 U.S. 10, 15.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.