Supreme Court of the United States, 1933

Factor v. Laubenheimer

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 29, 1933

289 U.S. 713; 53 S. Ct. 790 (United States Reports)

Counsel

. Mr. Newton D. Baker, with whom Messrs. Rush C. Butler, S. O. Levinson, and G. Gale Gilbert, Jr., were on the brief, for petitioner., Mr. Franklin R. Overmyer for respondents.

Cases that cite this one

5 later published cases cite this decision.

Kirk v. Siquier (9th Cir. 1945)
Factor v. Laubenheimer (Supreme Court of the United States 1933)
United States v. Chaplin (United States District Court for the Southern District of California 1944)
Sheets v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (8th Cir. 1938)
In re Factor's Extradition (7th Cir. 1934)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

This case is restored to the docket and assigned for reargument on Monday, October 9 next,upon all questions involved, including the question whether the offense charged is an extraditable offense under the Treaty of Í889, even if the offense does not constitute a crime under the law of the State of Illinois or under any acts of Congress. The attention of counsel is directed to the interpretation placed upon Article X of the treaty of 1842 by the Secretary of State of the United States, John C. Calhoun, shortly after the ratification of the Treaty (August 7, 1844, January 28, 1845, MSS. Inst. Gr. Br.),and also to the available diplomatic correspondence relating to Article X of the Treaty of 1842 and the Treaty of 1889.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.