Supreme Court of the United States, 1934

Kent-Coffey Mfg. Co. v. Maxwell

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided January 22, 1934

291 U.S. 642; 54 S. Ct. 437 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Messrs. Mark Squires and Samuel J. Ervin, Jr., for appellant. Mr. Dennis G. Brummitt, Attorney General of North Carolina, with whom Mr. A. A. F. Seawell, Assistant Attorney General, was on the brief, for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

9 later published cases cite this decision.

Mercury Motor Express, Inc. v. South Carolina Tax Commission (S.C. 1964)
Moorman Manufacturing Co. v. Bair (Iowa 1977)
Eastman Kodak Co. v. District of Columbia (District Court, District of Columbia 1942)
Morton Salt Co. v. State (Kan. 1939)
Commonwealth v. Columbia Gas & Electric Corp. (Pa. 1939)
Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. North Carolina Ex Rel. Maxwell (Supreme Court of the United States 1936)
Turco Paint & Varnish Co. v. Kalodner (Pa. 1936)
Maxwell, Comr. of Revenue v. . R. R. (N.C. 1935)
State ex rel. Maxwell v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. (N.C. 1935)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

This case, is controlled by the decision in Underwood Typewriter Co. v. Chamberlain, 254 U.S. 113, and not by the decision in Hans Rees’ Sons v. North Carolina, 283 U.S. 123. The judgment is affirmed.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.