Ohio ex rel. Eastman v. Stuart

Supreme Court of the United States February 12, 1934

Ohio ex rel. Eastman v. Stuart, 291 U.S. 643 (1934)

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the judgment sought here to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Yesler v. Washington Harbor Line Comm’rs, 146 U.S. 646, 657; Farson Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U.S. 268, *644271; Doyle v. Atwell, 261 U.S. 590; Howat v. Kansas, 258 U.S. 181, 189, 190; McCoy v. Shaw, 277 U.S. 302, 303.

Messrs. Erwin R. Effler, Rufus H. Baker, and Harold W. Fraser for appellant. Messrs. Frazier Reams and J. S. Rhinefort for appellees.

Reference

Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published