Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of the United States, 1934

Ohio ex rel. Eastman v. Stuart

Ohio ex rel. Eastman v. Stuart
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided February 12, 1934
291 U.S. 643 (United States Reports)

Ohio ex rel. Eastman v. Stuart

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The appeal herein is dismissed for the reason that the judgment sought here to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Yesler v. Washington Harbor Line Comm’rs, 146 U.S. 646, 657; Farson Son & Co. v. Bird, 248 U.S. 268, *644271; Doyle v. Atwell, 261 U.S. 590; Howat v. Kansas, 258 U.S. 181, 189, 190; McCoy v. Shaw, 277 U.S. 302, 303.

Messrs. Erwin R. Effler, Rufus H. Baker, and Harold W. Fraser for appellant. Messrs. Frazier Reams and J. S. Rhinefort for appellees.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑