Supreme Court of the United States, 1934

Northwest Bancorporation v. Benson

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 7, 1934 · Appeal, Consideration, Took

292 U.S. 606; 54 S. Ct. 775 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Messrs. G. A. Youngquist, F. H. Stinchfield, and Claude G. Krause for appellant. Mr. Harry H. Peterson for appellees.

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

Munoz v. Porto Rico Ry. Light & Power Co. (1st Cir. 1936)
National Accounting Co. v. Dorman (Supreme Court of the United States 1935)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per curiam:

The motion for im*607mediate consideration of the jurisdictional statement' is granted. The order denying interlocutory injunction is affirmed. United Fuel Gas Co. v. Railroad Commission, 278 U.S. 300, 326; Alabama v. United States, 279 U.S. 229, 231; National Fire Ins. Co. v. Thompson, 281 U.S. 331, 338; United Drug Co. v. Washburn, 284 U.S. 593; South Carolina Power Co. v. South Carolina Tax Comm’n, 286 U.S. 525; Ogden & Moffett Co. v. Michigan Public Utilities Comm’n, 286 U.S. 525.

Messrs. G. A. Youngquist, F. H. Stinchfield, and Claude G. Krause for appellant. Mr. Harry H. Peterson for appellees. Mr. Justice Butler took no part in the consideration and decision of this appeal.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.