U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Toledo

Supreme Court of the United States May 28, 1934

U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Toledo, 292 U.S. 611 (1934)

54 S. Ct. 858

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The appeals herein are dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Fisher v. New Orleans, 218 U.S. 438, 440; Seattle & Renton Ry. v. Linhoff, 231 U.S. 568, 570; Enterprise Irrigation District v. Canal Co., 243 U.S. 157, 165, 166; Tidal Oil Co. v. Flannagan, 263 U.S. 444, 451; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U.S. 312, 316, 317; American Ry. Express Co. v. Ken*612tucky, 273 U.S. 269, 272, 273; Comer v. Washington, ante, p. 610. Mr. Ray Martin for appellants in Nos. 978, 979, and 980. Mr. Harold W. Fraser for appellant in No. 981.

Mr. U. G. Denman for appellants in No. 982. Messrs. Ralph W. Doty and Earl F. Boxell for appellees.

Reference

Full Case Name: U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Toledo Standard Surety & Casualty Co. v. Same National Surety Co. v. Same Guardian Casualty Co. v. Same and Van Schaick, Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New York v. Same
Cited By: 1 case
Status: Published