Hall Approved Free Access to American Case Law
Supreme Court of the United States, 1934

U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Toledo

U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Toledo
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided May 28, 1934
292 U.S. 611; 54 S. Ct. 858 (United States Reports)

U.S. Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Toledo

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The appeals herein are dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Fisher v. New Orleans, 218 U.S. 438, 440; Seattle & Renton Ry. v. Linhoff, 231 U.S. 568, 570; Enterprise Irrigation District v. Canal Co., 243 U.S. 157, 165, 166; Tidal Oil Co. v. Flannagan, 263 U.S. 444, 451; Hebert v. Louisiana, 272 U.S. 312, 316, 317; American Ry. Express Co. v. Ken*612tucky, 273 U.S. 269, 272, 273; Comer v. Washington, ante, p. 610. Mr. Ray Martin for appellants in Nos. 978, 979, and 980. Mr. Harold W. Fraser for appellant in No. 981.

Mr. U. G. Denman for appellants in No. 982. Messrs. Ralph W. Doty and Earl F. Boxell for appellees.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.

↑