Supreme Court of the United States, 1934

Baldwin v. G. A. F. Seelig, Inc.

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 15, 1934

293 U.S. 522; 55 S. Ct. 120 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Henry S. Manley for appellants. No appearance for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

7 later published cases cite this decision.

Munoz v. Porto Rico Ry. Light & Power Co. (1st Cir. 1936)
Pearce v. Pure-Vac Dairy Products Corp. (United States District Court Eastern District of Louisiana 1961)
Grosjean v. Texas Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1936)
Foley v. Wachs (Supreme Court of the United States 1936)
Corporation Comm'n of Okla. v. Cary (Supreme Court of the United States 1935)
Wilshire Oil Co. v. United States (Supreme Court of the United States 1935)
National Accounting Co. v. Dorman (Supreme Court of the United States 1935)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

Appeal from an order granting an interlocutory injunction. Jurisdictional statement has been filed. The order is affirmed. Alabama v. United States, 279 U. S. 229, 231; National Fire Ins. Co. v. Thompson, 281 U. S. 331, 338; United Gas Co. v. Public Service Commission, 278 U. S. 322, 326, 327; United Drug Co. v. Washburn, 284 U. S. 593; South Carolina *523Power Co. v. South Carolina Tax Comm’n, 286 U. S. 525; Ogden & Moffet Co. v. Michigan Public Utilities Comm’n, 286 U. S. 525; Langer v. Crandin Farmers Co-operative Elevator Co., 292 U. S. 605; Northwest Ban-corporation v. Benson, 292 TJ. S. 606.

Mr. Henry S. Manley for appellants. No appearance for appellee.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.