Supreme Court of the United States, 1934

Laing v. Fox

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 22, 1934 · No. 433

293 U.S. 525; 55 S. Ct. 126; 79 L. Ed. 636; 1934 U.S. LEXIS 62 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Arthur S. Dayton for appellant. Mr. Homer A: Holt for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

1 later published case cites this decision.

John Laing v. Fred L. Fox, State Tax Commissioner of the State of West Virginia (Supreme Court of the United States 1934)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The motion of appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. (1) Southwestern Oil Co. v. Texas, 217 U. S. 114, 121; Brown-Forman Co. v. Kentucky, 217 U. S. 563, 572 et seq.; American Sugar Refining Co. v. Louisiana, 179 U. S. 89, 95; Hicklin v. Coney, 290 U. S. 169, 176. (2) League v. Texas, 184 U. S. 156, 161; Kentucky Union Co. v. Kentucky, 219 U. S. 140, 152-153; Magnano Co. v. Hamilton, 292 U. S. 40, 44; (3) Knights of Pythias v. Meyer, 265 U. S. 30, 32-33; Hicklin v. Coney, 290 U. S. 169, 172; Hartford Accident Co. v. Nelson Co., 291 U. S. 352, 358; Swiss Oil Corp. v. Shanks, 273 U. S., 407, 413.

Case-law data current through September 30, 2026. Source: CourtListener bulk data.