Hammond Clock Co. v. Schiff
Cases that cite this one
14 later published cases cite this decision. The 11 that cite it most often are listed here.
- Cameron-Grant v. Maxim Healthcare Services, Inc. (11th Cir. 2003)
- Brunet v. City Of Columbus (6th Cir. 1993)
- Brunet v. City of Columbus (6th Cir. 1993)
- Oklahoma Radio Associates v. Federal Deposit Insurance (10th Cir. 1993)
- Lusardi v. Xerox Corp. (3d Cir. 1992)
- Kleiner v. First National Bank (11th Cir. 1985)
- In the Matter of the Magnavox Company and Sanders Associates, Inc. Appeal of Universal Research Laboratories, Inc., Debtor (7th Cir. 1980)
- Acheson, Secretary of State v. Droesse (D.C. Cir. 1952)
- Acheson v. Droesse (D.C. Cir. 1952)
- BMO Harris Bank NA v. Corley (United States District Court for the District of Arizona 2023)
- United States v. Munsingwear, Inc. (Supreme Court of the United States 1950)
This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.
Opinion of the Court
On consideration of a suggestion by petitioner that the cause herein has become moot by reason of settlement between the parties, and of a motion by petitioner to reverse the decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals and to remand the 'cause with directions to dismiss, and respondent having consented to the entry of an order pursuant to the motion, it is ordered that the said motion be, and it is hereby, granted, and the decree of the Circuit Court of Appeals is reversed and the cause is remanded to the District Court with directions to vacate its decree and to dismiss the bill of complaint as against the respondent without prejudice, and without costs to either party, upon the ground that the cause is moot. Brownlow v. Schwartz, 261 U. S. 216; United States v. Hamburg American Co., 239 U. S. 466, 477-478; Commercial Cable Co. v. Burleson, 250 U. S. 350, 362-363; C. M. Patten & Co. v. United States, 289 U. S. 705; First Union Trust & Savings Bank v. Consumers Co., 290 U. S. 585; Danciger Oil & Refining Co. v. Smith, 290 U. S. 599.
Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.