Supreme Court of the United States, 1935

Via v. State Commission on Conservation & Development

Via v. State Commission on Conservation & Development
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided November 25, 1935
296 U.S. 549; 56 S. Ct. 245 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. William J. Hughes, Jr., with whom Mr. William E. Leahy was on the brief, for appellant., Mr. Abram P. Staples, Attorney General of Virginia, was on the brief for appellee.

Via v. State Commission on Conservation & Development

Cases that cite this one

2 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The decree is affirmed on the ground that appellant has an adequate remedy at law. Insurance Co. v. Bailey, 13 Wall. 616, 623; Grand Chute v. Winegar, 15 Wall. 373, 375, 376; Gaines v. Nicholson, 9 How. 356, 364—365; Wehrman v. Conkling, 155 U. S. 314, 326.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.