Supreme Court of the United States, 1936

Gause v. Detroit Trust Co.

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided February 17, 1936

297 U.S. 695; 80 L. Ed. 986; 56 S. Ct. 572; 1936 U.S. LEXIS 1034 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Messrs. Henry B. Graves and Mark L. Rowley for appellant., Mr. Jason L. Honigman, with whom Messrs. Alex J. Groesbeck and A. W. Sempliner were on the brief, for appellee.

Cases that cite this one

22 later published cases cite this decision.

People v. Potts (Mich. Ct. App. 1974)
Fitch v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (8th Cir. 1939)
Donnelley v. Commissioner (7th Cir. 1939)
State v. McAllister (La. 1978)
People v. Birmingham (Mich. Ct. App. 1968)
John Edwin Byers v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary, Lansing, Kansas (10th Cir. 1964)
Morrill v. United States (District Court, D. Maine 1964)
James H. Johnson v. State of Kansas and Tracy A. Hand, Warden, Kansas State Penitentiary, Lansing, Kansas (10th Cir. 1960)
Kneisley v. Hudspeth (Kan. 1946)
Suhr v. Commissioner (6th Cir. 1942)
Whiteley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (3d Cir. 1941)
Kuhn v. Princess Lida of Thurn & Taxis (3d Cir. 1941)
Helvering v. Leonard (2d Cir. 1939)
Barbour v. Commissioner (United States Board of Tax Appeals 1939)
Hudson v. Jones (United States District Court, Oklahoma Western 1938)
Detroit Trust Co. v. Drummond (Mich. 1938)
Waesche v. Thurmont Bank (Supreme Court of the United States 1938)
Twin Falls County v. Henderson (Supreme Court of the United States 1938)
Alsop v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue (3d Cir. 1937)
Southern Nebraska Power Co. v. Nebraska ex rel. Sorensen (Supreme Court of the United States 1937)
Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Grosvenor (2d Cir. 1936)
Detroit Trust Co. v. Hartwick (Mich. 1936)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Appeal from the Supreme Court of Michigan.

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for reason that the judgment sought here to be reviewed is based upon a non-federal ground adequate to support it. Bell Tele*696phone Co. v. Van Dyke, 296 U. S. 533; Enterprise Irrigation District v. Canal Co., 243 U. S. 157, 162, 165; Hale v. Lewis, 181 U. S. 473, 479, 480; Eustis v. Bolles, 150 U. S. 361, 368, 370.

Messrs. Henry B. Graves and Mark L. Rowley for appellant. Mr. Jason L. Honigman, with whom Messrs. Alex J. Groesbeck and A. W. Sempliner were on the brief, for appellee.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.