Supreme Court of the United States, 1936

Ham v. Equitable Life Assurance Society

Ham v. Equitable Life Assurance Society
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 12, 1936
299 U.S. 505; 57 S. Ct. 24 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Messrs. Ray E. Lee and James A. Greenwood for appellant., Messrs. John U. Loomis and James H. McIntosh for appellee.

Ham v. Equitable Life Assurance Society

Cases that cite this one

14 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam:

The motion of the appellee to dismiss the appeal herein is granted, and the appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Seattle & Renton Ry. v. Linhoff, 231 U. S. 568, 570; Gasguet v. Lapeyre, 242 U. S. 367, 369; Enterprise Irrigation Dist. v. Canal Co., 243 U. S. 157, 165, 166.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.