Polk Co. v. Mayo
Supreme Court of the United States
Polk Co. v. Mayo, 299 U.S. 507 (1936)
57 S. Ct. 39
Polk Co. v. Mayo
Opinion of the Court
The motion for leave to amend the statement as to jurisdiction is granted. The appeal is dismissed for the want of a substantial federal question. Gundling v. Chicago, 177 U. S. 183, 188; Payne v. Kansas, 248 U. S. 112; Arnold v. Hanna, 276 U. S. 591; cf. Sligh v. Kirkwood, 237 U. S. 52, 61, 62.
Reference
- Full Case Name
- Polk Company v. Mayo, Commissioner of Agriculture
- Cited By
- 4 cases
- Status
- Published