Supreme Court of the United States, 1936

Continental Oil Co. v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 12, 1936

299 U.S. 510 (United States Reports)

Counsel

Mr. Arthur B. Hyman for petitioner., Solicitor General Reed for the United States.

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision. The 3 that cite it most often are listed here.

Gaudiosi v. Mellon (3d Cir. 1959)
Leishman v. Associated Wholesale Electric Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1943)
Philadelphia v. Union Traction Co. (Supreme Court of the United States 1938)

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion of the Court

The application for a writ of certiorari to the Court of Claims is dismissed upon the ground that it is premature, without prejudice to a renewal of the application after action by the Court of Claims on the *511motion for amendment of the special findings. The motion to defer consideration of the application for certiorari is denied.

Mr. Arthur B. Hyman for petitioner. Solicitor General Reed for the United States.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.