Supreme Court of the United States, 1937

Royal Indemnity v. Cardillo

Royal Indemnity v. Cardillo
Supreme Court of the United States · Decided October 25, 1937
302 U.S. 736; 58 S. Ct. 122 (United States Reports)
Royal Indemnity v. Cardillo

Cases that cite this one

4 later published cases cite this decision.

This list shows which later cases cite this one. It does not say how they treated it, and no review of that has been done. Not a substitute for Shepard’s or KeyCite — verify before relying.

Opinion

302 U.S. 736

58 S.Ct. 122

82 L.Ed. 569

ROYAL INDEMNITY COMPANY, a corporation, et al., petitioners,
v.
Frank A. CARDILLO, Deputy Commissioner, United States Employees' Compensation Commission and James S. Rennie.*

No. 411.

Supreme Court of the United States

October 25, 1937

Messrs. Norman B. Frost, Frank H. Myers ad Frederic N. Towers, all of Washington, D. C., for petitioners.

1

Mr. James E. McCabe, of Washington, D. C., for respondent Rennie.

2

Messrs. Stanley Reed, Sol. Gen., of Washington, D. C., and Sam E. Whitaker, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Henry A. Julicher, of Washington, D. C., for respondent Frank A. Cardillo.

3

For opinion below, see Hoage v. Royal Ind. Co., 67 App.D.C. 142, 90 F.(2d) 387.

4

Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia denied.

*

Rehearing denied 302 U.S. 778, 58 S.Ct. 270, 82 L.Ed. ——.

Case-law data current through December 31, 2025. Source: CourtListener bulk data.